SANTRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. (REVENUE), LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/6248/2025 · 2025-10-28
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202861 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202861 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6248 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to Settlement Officer of Consolidation, District Faizabad to decide Case bearing No.2000540423000005 (Appeal No.68) (Santram Vs. State of U.P. and others) under Rule 109 -A (3) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is decided in a time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing counsel has no objection, if direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the revision.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, Settlement Officer of Consolidation, District Faizabad is directed to decide Case bearing No.2000540423000005 (Appeal No.68) (Santram Vs. State of U.P. and others) under Rule 109 -A (3) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rama Nand Yadav, Deepesh Kumar Yadav, Krishna Chandra Rawat, Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Santram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. (Revenue), Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
of. October 28, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6248 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench