HEERA SINGH INSPECTOR PNO NO.- 86570691 v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/9076/2025 · 2025-10-28
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202836 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202836 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9076 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-respondents.
2. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the representations of the petitioner dated 22.07.2025 and 08.09.2025 submitted in response to the notice dated 11.07.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition.
3. A perusal of the notice would indicate that the petitioner has been asked to submit his reply in the proforma as has been annexed to the said notice.
4. It is not understood as to why the petitioner is shying away from submitting the reply in the said proforma more particularly when the said notice pertains to disproportionate assets of the petitioner. Even otherwise, the said notice is dated 11.07.2025 and the petitioner has been asked to submit his reply within a period of one week.
5. Upon a specific query being put to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether any reply has been submitted to the said notice, the petitioner has categorically stated that no reply has been submitted by the petitioner till date although he submitted representations.
6. It is not understood that when the respondents categorically required the petitioner to submit his reply within a period of one week and a period of more than three and a half months has lapsed since then as to why the respondents have not proceeded against the petitioner in absence of the said reply. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Nandan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Heera Singh Inspector Pno No.- 86570691 .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Considering the aforesaid more particularly the tenor of notice in which the petitioner has been asked to submit his reply in a particular proforma, no case for interference is made out.
8. The writ petition stands dismissed leaving it open to the respondents to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law once no reply has been submitted by him till date. October 28, 2025 prateek CRLP No. 9076 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench