RANJEET v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/8482/2025 · 2025-10-28
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202827 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202827 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8482 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 87 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 96, 65(1) BNS and Sections4(2) POCSO Act, P.S. Sareni, District Raebareli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of informant was missing and the some unknown person had enticed her. Subsequently in her statement under Section 183 BNSS the victim stated that her mother had scolded her and on the instance of one Gunjan she was taken to her home who sent the victim with her brother i.e. the applicant with whom the victim stayed for two days and wrong was also committed. It was also stated that the applicant had taken the victim to Kanpur Railway Station and thereafter left her. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the victim stayed with the applicant for two days and also gone to public places without raising hue and cry and the medical on record does not corroborate the allegations, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 26.4.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Dhirendra Pratap Singh, Jayant Singh, Pragya Singh Ranjeet .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Ranjeet be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 28, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8482 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench