HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9496 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, the learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court be pleased to issue a direction to the learned trial court / Magistrate to accept one personal bond and two sureties for all cases in which the petitioner has been granted bail by this Hon'ble Court as well trail court. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit surety in each of case in which he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in all ten cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- (i) Crime No. 593/2003, U/S-147,148,149,307,506 I.P.C. and 3(1) of U.P.G. Act, registered at P.S.-Gusaiganj, District-Sultanpur. In the aforesaid crime No. the petitioner has been enlarged on bail in Bail Application No: 2534/2025. (ii) Crime No. 316/2009, U/S-467,468,471,419,420,120-B,34.I.P.C., registered at P.S.- Jaisinghpur, District-Sultanpur. In the aforesaid crime No. the petitioner has been enlarged on bail. (iii) Crime No. 609/2011,U/S- 406 I.P.C., registered at P.S.- Gusaiganj, District-Sultanpur. In the aforesaid crime No. the petitioner has been enlarged on bail in Bail Application No: 957/2015. (iv) Crime No. 99/2012,U/S- 2/3(1) of U.P.G. Act, registered at P.S.- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Krishna Dev Singh @ K.D. Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Govt. Of U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Kotwali Nagar, District-Sultanpur. In the aforesaid crime No. the petitioner has been enlarged on bail in Bail Application No: 2452/2025. (v) Crime No. 2295/2013,U/S-41, 411,413,419,420 I.P.C., registered at P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District-Sultanpur. In the aforesaid crime No. the petitioner has been enlarged on bail in Bail Application No: 3268/2025. (vi) Crime No. 331/2025, U/S- 8/20 of N.D.P.S Act., registered at P.S.- Gusaiganj, District-Sultanpur. In the aforesaid crime No. the petitioner has been enlarged on bail in Bail Application No: 2306/2025. (vii) Crime No. 386/2025, U/S- 303(2), 317(2) B.N.S 2023 (In I.P.C. Section 379, 411), registered at P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur. In the aforesaid crime No. the petitioner has been enlarged on bail in Bail Application No: 3274/2025. 4. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail, the applicant is still in jail and the applicant being poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. November 12, 2025 Manoj A482 No. 9496 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench