SHRI PRASAD YADAV AND ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A227/6191/2025 · 2025-10-28
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202816 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202816 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6191 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Ms. Riya Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records.
2. The learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection stating that although the State of U.P. is not a party to the suit regarding which a direction has been sought through this petition and therefore the petition suffers from the defect of misjoinder of parties.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners accepts that State of U.P. has been impleaded erroneously and she has made an oral request for deleting the State of U.P. from the array of parties.
4. The oral request of learned counsel for the petitioners is accepted and she is directed to strike out the State of U.P. from the array of opposite parties and to renumber the remaining opposite parties.
5. Keeping in view the reliefs sought and the order proposed to be passed this petition is being finally disposed of without issuing notice to the opposite parties.
6. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neera Yadav, Riya Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shri Prasad Yadav And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Constitution of India the petitioners have sought issuance of a direction to learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Sadar, Ayodhya to decide Civil Suit No.561 of 2016 expeditiously.
7. The aforesaid suit was filed by the petitioners in August, 2016 praying for a decree for cancellation of sale deed and demolition of structure.
8. The pleadings of suit have already completed and the suit is at the stage of evidence.
9. As the suit is pending since the year 2016, the present petition is disposed of by issuing a direction to learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Sadar, Ayodhya to decide Civil Suit No.561 of 2016 expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties and try to conclude the same at the earliest. October 28, 2025 Ram. A227 No. 6191 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench