HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9930 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated September 30, 2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising her grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.4 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.4/ Tehsildar, Tehsil Lambhua, District Sultanpur is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the private respondent No.6. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 28, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Vimla Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench