IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4807 of 2024 ------ Aslam Ansari @ Md. Aslam Ansari, aged about 54 years, son of Rahaman Ansari, resident of Vill-House No. 63, Oyna, P.O.-Chandwe, P.S.-Pithoria, Dist.-Ranchi … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jagmohan Prasad, son of late Shivratan Saw, resident of Mohalla East Boring Canal Road, P.O.-G.P.O., P.S.-Buddha Colony, Dist.-Patna, Bihar … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl. P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Ms. Saba Ali, Advocate ------ Order No.10 Dated- 06.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No.159 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under sections 420/467/468/471/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with one Pawan Kumar obtained forged power of attorney of the land of the informant and Pawan Kumar sold the land of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the informant does not want to proceed with the case. It is then submitted that the dispute between the parties is at best a civil dispute. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No.159 of 2022 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-