Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20281 (CAL)

SMT AMRITA PANDEY v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA(P)/209/2022 · 2025-08-18

Smita Das De, Sujoy Paul

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18.08.2025 Item no. DL 25 Court No. 08 Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA(P) 209 of 2022 In the matter of : SMT. AMRITA PANDEY …. Petitioner VS. THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ….Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Sukanta Ghosh Ms. Sneha Singh ….Advocates For the State : Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee Mr. Saaqib Siddiqui ….Advocates 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition / PIL has rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. 3. Thus, the PIL is dismissed having rendered infructuous. ( Sujoy Paul, J. ) ( Smita Das De, J.)