MERAB BANO v. BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 7 OTHERS
A227/6361/2025 · 2025-10-28
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202803 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202803 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6361 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to the State-respondent to decide revision bearing Revision No. 265 of 2017 Computerized Case No. R2017034100265 (Shabi Ahmad and others Vs. Merab Bano and others) U/S 219 of Land and Reforms Act, 1901 expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Revision No. 265 of 2017 Computerized Case No. R2017034100265 (Shabi Ahmad and others Vs. Merab Bano and others) U/S 219 of Land and Reforms Act, 1901, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Laxmi Narayan Gupta, Devendra Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Merab Bano .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Chairman And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 Ravi/Anurag A227 No. 6361 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench