Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20280 (AP)

G MURALI KRISHNA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/14317/2025 · 2025-06-24

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC0102845a2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 14317 OF 2025 Between: G Murali Krishna, Aged above 50 Years Occ: Supervisor, Agriculture Market Committee Guntur, Guntur District. ...Petitioner^ AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary Agriculture, Sericulture, Cooperation and Marketing Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Agriculture Market Committee Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Principal Secretary Finance Department Secretariat EJuildings Velagapudi, Guntur District. 4. Commissioner and Director, Agriculture Market Committee Chuttugunta Circle, Guntur, Guntur District. I ...Respondents 2^of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Petition under Article -A Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings AGC05-15021/24/2025-G NT- ,3UP-1, dated 9-6-2025 issued by the 4*^ respondent by effecting the transfers of Supervisors and issuing postings to the petitioner, posting him to AMC, Kuchinapudi instead of option of preferred stations by the petitioner and not considering the petitioner Seniority is arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the guidelines of G.O.Ms.No,23 dt 15-5-2025 and in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India and to set aside the same in respect of the petitioner and to issue a consequential direction to the 4th Respondent to follow the guideline no, 4 (vii) of G.O.Ms.No.23, dt 15-5-2025 consider and post the petitioner in the existence vacancies of the opted preferential stations or nearest stations. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thd petition, the High Court may be pleased to stop further proceeding pleased to stay further proceeding on AGC05- 15021/24/2025-GNT- respondent. 1: the SUP-1, dated 9-6-2025 issued by the 4 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CHEJARLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following order: <• APHC010284592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 14317/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER G Murali Krishna AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .CHEJARLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR SERVICES I :2.GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned proceedings, dated 09.06.2025, issued by the 4*^ respondent, by which he has been transferred from present station to Agriculture Market Committee at Kuchinapudi, which is against his choice of preferences. CGR, J. W.P.No.14317 of 2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has made choice of three places viz., Mangalagiri, Prathipadu and Chilakaluripeta in terms of clause 4(i) of G.O.Ms.No.23 Finance (HR.I-PLG.& Policy) Department, dated 15.05.2025, however, now 4**^ respondent has passed impugned orders transferring the petitioner other than his choice of preferences. Learned counsel submits that petitioner may be permitted to make representation to reconsider the aforesaid transfer in case there are existing vacancies in any of aforesaid stations of his choice. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-ll has placed on record written instructions stating that as petitioner has already stayed for more than five years in the present station, he falls under invariably transfer, therefore, as per the vacancies available, his case has been considered. 3. 4. A glance of Clause 4(i) of the guidelines goes to show that in case employee who stays more than five years, he has to be invariably transferred and such employee is entitled to exercise pi'0ference of stations and as petitioner has already exercised such option and gave three stations as preferences, the respondents are direc|^ed to consider the request of the petitioner in terms of the L 3 CGR, J. W.P.No.14317 of2025 aforesaid choices made in case there are any vacancies available and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as 5. to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand dosed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISJIIAR //TRUE COPY// i To, 1. The Special Chief Secretary Agriculture, Sericulture, Cooperation and Marketing Department Secretariat, State of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Principal Secretary to Government Agriculture Market Committee Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 3. The Principal Secretary Finance Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat buildings Velagapudi, Guntur District. 4. The Commissioner and Director, Agriculture Market Committee Chuttugunta Circle, Guntur, Guntur District. 5. One CC to Sri. Chejarla N/enkbteswara Rao Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Service I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CCs to GP for Service I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 8. Three CD Copies Gsc(gsg) HIGH COURT DATE0:25/06/2025 ORDER WP 14317/2025 0 5JUL 2025 m o»j ^SsXurrentSectjgjjX'C^ DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS