DEVANSHU RAI v. SMT. PRIYANKA NIRANJAN DISTT. MAGISTRATE GONDA AND 2 OTHERS
CAPL/3401/2025 · 2025-10-28
Manish Kumar
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202793 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202793 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3401 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Heard. Present contempt application has been preferred for alleged non- compliance of the judgment and order of the Writ Court dated 26.03.2025 passed in Public Interest Litigation no. 263 of 2025. The relevant extract of the said judgment and order is being reproduced hereinbelow:-
"3. Considering the fact that the proceedings for removal of encroachment have already been concluded, present petition is disposed off with direction that the proceedings which have already been concluded shall be executed in accordance with law unless there is any interim order passed by any competent court of law. "
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that compliance of the
judgment and order of the Writ Court dated 26.03.2025 is not being done by the respondents by removing the encroachment. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant and going through the record of the case, it is found that the Writ Court has disposed of the writ petition filed by the applicant with a direction to the respondents to execute the proceedings for removal of encroachment but it is not being implemented and executed till date, as per the submission made by
learned counsel for the applicant. For execution/implementation/compliance of the order passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the applicant has a remedy to file an Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dileep Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Devanshu Rai .....Applicant(s) Smt. Priyanka Niranjan Distt. Magistrate Gonda And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
application under para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual. In view of the aforesaid, the present case is devoid of merit, hence, dismissed.
October 28, 2025 Ashish CAPL No. 3401 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench