Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202789 (ALL)

GYANENDRA MISHRA v. MINISTRY OF CULTURE GOVT. INDIA THRU. SECY. NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/12501/2025 · 2025-10-28

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12501 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.B.Pandey, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 1 to 3 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :- "i. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no-2 to consider the case of petitioner for regularization on the post of lower divisional clerk or Data entry operator (DEO). ii. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to not appoint any person for the post of Data entry operator (DEO) at R.C. Lucknow at the place of petitioner through service provider or any other means." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2/Secretary, Lalit Kala Akadmi(National Academy of Art), New Delhi and the opposite party no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Kumar Misra, Vartika Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Gyanendra Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Ministry Of Culture Govt. India Thru. Secy. New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 2/ Secretary, Lalit Kala Akadmi(National Academy of Art), New Delhi within a period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of two months, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. October 28, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12501 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench