Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202781 (ALL)

BINDU SINGH v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR, NAWABGANJ, TEHSIL TARABGANJ, GONDA AND OTHERS

A227/6358/2025 · 2025-10-28

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6358 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for a direction to the State-respondent to decide Mutation proceedings vide Case No. 1742 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T202508300601742) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code (Bindu Singh Vs. Smt. Anita Singh & others) expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar Nawabganj, Tehsil Tarabganj, District Gonda is directed to decide Case No. 1742 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T202508300601742) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code (Bindu Singh Vs. Smt. Anita Singh & others) , expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganga Prasad Mishra, Abhinav Mishra, Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Bindu Singh .....Petitioner(s) Nayab Tehsildar, Nawabganj, Tehsil Tarabganj, Gonda And Others .....Respondent(s) copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 Ravi/Anurag A227 No. 6358 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench