[2025:RJ-JP:30309] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6982/2025 Rohit Godala @ Kabootar S/o Shri Rajesh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Purani Sabarmati Colony, Kota City, Police Station Kaithonipol, Kota, District Kota (Raj.) (At Presently Confined In District Jail District Kota). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 06/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.172/2024 registered at Police Station Kanwas, District Kota Rural for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of BNS, 2023. Later on, Police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 331(6), 311 of BNS, 2023 and Section 27(1) of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that other co-accused namely Shakil Ahmed, Yogesh @ Anshu and Sameer @ Echi have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as co-ordiante Bench of this Court. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed and trial [2025:RJ-JP:30309] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6982/2025] of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that other criminal cases have been registered against the petitioner, therefore, bail should not be granted to him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also looking to the fact that other co- accused namely Shakil Ahmed, Yogesh @ Anshu and Sameer @ Echi have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as co-ordiante Bench of this Court; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow this bail application. 6. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Rohit Godala @ Kabootar S/o Shri Rajesh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all [2025:RJ-JP:30309] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6982/2025] subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /422