THE KARNATAKA GOVT. EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD v. SMT. GAYATHRI @ GAYATHRIDEVI
RFA/694/2023 · 2025-01-20
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20278 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20278 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2197 RFA No. 694 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 694 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN:
THE KARNATAKA GOVT. EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., REG NO.166, D.R. 31-5-1949, CELLAR FLOOR, MULTI-STORIED BUILDING, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, MR H.T.NAGESH. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. JITHENDRA.M.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. GAYATHRI @ GAYATHRIDEVI D/O LATE THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.107/4, PETHAPPA LANE, ANNASANDRA PALYA, HAL POST, BENGALURU.
REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER, K.RUDRAMUNI.
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT 49, NEW NO.94/A, SITE FORMED BY DEFENDANT, FORMED IN SY NO.34/2, DYAVASANDRA VILLAGE, MSR NAGAR, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 094. …RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2197 RFA No. 694 of 2023
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 20.01.2025.
The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2197 RFA No. 694 of 2023
order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31