GUDDU PRASAD AND 11 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/11484/2025 · 2025-10-28
Shree Prakash Singh
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202777 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202777 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11484 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Mr. Manish Nigam, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3, and Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh,
learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had applied for Banda, Hamirpur, Jalaun and Lalitpur though the request of the petitioners have not been considered. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent no.3, on the basis of instructions, submits that aforesaid districts were taken out from the list of transfer and, therefore, the petitioners could not be transferred in the districts mentioned as above. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that interest of justice would be subserved, if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 and the respondent no.3 is directed to consider and decide the same within stipulated period of time as fixed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the submissions aforesaid. In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner is permitted to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3/Secretary, Board of Basic Education, U.P. at Prayagraj and if such, representation is moved the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Nigam, Amit Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh Guddu Prasad And 11 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
respondent no.3 is directed to consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. It is, however, made clear that the petitioners shall make individual representation before the respondent no.3. October 28, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 11484 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench