HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9776 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Meera Tripathi, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and perused the record. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4is hereby dispensed with. 3. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. bearing FIR/Case Crime No.279 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 281, 125, 324 (4), 109 of B.N.S., Police Station- Patti , District- Pratapgarh. 4. Ms. Meera Tripathi, learned A.G.A has produced instruction/letter dated 15.10.2025. The same is taken on record. As per the instruction, initially besides other sections the matter was being investigated under Section 109 B.N.S. but during investigation Section 109 B.N.S. has been dropped and in the remaining sections the maximum punishment is up to seven years. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in the FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas the police is trying to arrest the petitioner, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. 6. Learned A.G.A. appearing for respondent-State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Tripathi, Anand Dubey, Saurabh Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohd. Ramzan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin . Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) by the petitioner entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in re; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273 , and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. 7. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 8. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Apex Court in re; Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 9. However, it is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 3.11.2025 at 11:00 AM sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, he shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. October 28, 2025 Anuj Singh CRLP No. 9776 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench