HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1568 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "For the facts, reasons and circumstances as stated in the accompanying affidavit it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 12.12.2024 and summoning order dated 17.03.2025 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.29595/2025 State of U.P. Vs Anuj Kumar Verma & others Pending before Additional C.J.M COURT NO 27 LUCKNOW which is arising out of Case crime no.0472/2024 in offence U/s 115(2),324(4),351(3),352) Β. Ν. S. 2023 Police Station Gosaingang District Lucknow south (commissionerate Lucknow). It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the further proceedings of Criminal Case No.29595 /2025 State of U.P. Vs Anuj Kumar Verma & others pending before Additional C.J.M COURT NO 27 LUCKNOW till disposal of instant petition before this Hon'ble Court, as it is desirable in the interest of justice." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s). 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vaibhav Raj, Yogesh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anuj Kumar Verma And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. October 28, 2025 Vinay/- NA528 No. 1568 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench