Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202754 (ALL)

RAM NARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE RAEBARELI AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/10212/2025 · 2025-10-28

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10212 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 1 & 2 to consider the matter of petitioner and take appropriate action in the matter of petitioner in illegal encroachment over the Land Gata No. 49 holding of the petitioner, situated at Village Ghuri, Post-Melthuwa, Pargana-Ghuri (Dalmau), Tehsil-Dalmau, District-Raebareli. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite party No. 1 & 2 to ensure the lawful, requisition or acquisition in accordance with law and pay him compensation if acquired the petitioners land." 3. Shri Yogesh Chandra Bhatt, learned counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondent Nos.1 to 3, on instructions, submits that no construction is being carried out on Gata No.49 rather the construction is being carried out on Gata No.78. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Panna Lal Gupta, Ankur Gupta, Shiv Prasad Chaurasia, Subrat Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Ram Narayan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Raebareli And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. In view of aforesaid fact, no cause of action remains and, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of. October 28, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- WRIC No. 10212 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench