Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202749 (ALL)

VIMLA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/10164/2025 · 2025-10-28

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10164 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.90 of 2025, under Section 108 BNS, P.S. Badosaray, District Barabanki. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co-accused was enlarged on bail vide order dated 09.10.2025. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the reasoning as contained in Para 5 of the order dated 09.10.2025, the applicant who is in custody since 21.04.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vimla Devi be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Himanshu Suryavanshi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vimla Devi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 28, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 10164 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench