VIKAS PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPARTY OF ENERGY LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/931/2022 · 2025-10-28
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202740 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202740 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 931 of 2022 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 28, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hairdaya Narain Tiwari, Hari Mangal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Alok Saran (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vikas Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Departy Of Energy Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench