HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6320 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Hari Shanker Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil - Lambhua, District - Sultanpur, to decide Restoration Application dated 22.07.2025 registered as Case No. RST/4112/2019 (Computerized Case No. T 201904680304112) - Ram Bahadur Verma Vs. Lal Bahadur Verma & Others, U/S 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil - Lambhua, District - Sultanpur, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil - Lambhua, District - Sultanpur, is directed to decide Restoration Application dated 22.07.2025 registered as Case No. RST/4112/2019 (Computerized Case No. T 201904680304112) - Ram Bahadur Verma Vs. Lal Bahadur Verma & Others, U/S 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Shanker Tewari, Ajay Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Devidin Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench