Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202717 (ALL)

HARI PRASAD PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. REVENUE AND ORS.

WRIC/21577/2021 · 2025-10-28

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 21577 of 2021 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. The present writ petition has been appearing under the heading of "Priority Cases". 2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner(s) even in the revised call. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondent(s) is present. 4. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that no cause of action survives, and accordingly, the matter is consigned to record. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. 6. In the event, the petitioner(s) is of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner(s) to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law. October 28, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Chandra Agarwal, Rajnish Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Hari Prasad Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Revenue And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench