RAJESH KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/12602/2025 · 2025-10-28
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202705 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202705 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12602 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for payment of increment to petitioner due to petitioner in the year 2020.
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.5 i.e. District Development Officer, Ayodhya or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kinkar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rajesh Kumar Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Rural Development And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench