Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2027 (AP)

M. Jagan Mohan Reddy, v. Sri Shashibhushan Kumar,

CC/3518/2025 · 2026-06-17

Ninala Jayasurya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010608682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3518/2025 Between: 1. M. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY,, S/O. MURRA NARAPU REDDY, AGED 52 YEARS, POORVA BOMMEPALLI VILLAGE, JAMMAIAMADUGU MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 516 434 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI V R KRISHNA TEJA MYLAVARAPU IAS, COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT PVS EMPIRE, D.NO.12-47, PATHURU ROAD, BESIDE RELIANCE DIGITALS, TADEPALLE VILAGE, GUNTUR DIST. 4. SMT RAJAKUMARI GANIYA I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT MINERAL FUND TRUST, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. BALU NAIK, THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT BANDAR ROAD, OPP- PWD GROUNDS, NJS,J C.C No.3518 of 2025 2 VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 6. I VENU GOPAL, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOI DISTRICT 7. M RAGHURAM REDDY M TECH, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ (PIU) DIVISION KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. V SRINIVAS, THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, D.NO. 29-2-52, MANASA COMPLEX, RAMA MANDIRAM STREET, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMESH BABU TATAPUDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI NJS,J C.C No.3518 of 2025 3 The Court made the following Order: At the time of considering the matter, Mr. R Satish, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, states that pending the Contempt Case, the respondents have paid the amounts due to the petitioner. Therefore, requested this Court to close the Contempt Case. 2. Recording the same, this Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:18.06.2026 Ksj