Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202680 (ALL)

ANIL JAISWAL AND 4 OTHERS v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER, LUCKNOW DIVISION, LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

A227/6289/2025 · 2025-10-28

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6289 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Abhishek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents, if any, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow, to decide Revision No. 2397 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. C 202310000002397) - Anil Jaiswal and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow, is directed to decide Revision No. 2397 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. C 202310000002397) - Anil Jaiswal and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Kumar Singh, Anupam Singh, Shubhangi Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Alok Mathur,J.) Anil Jaiswal And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench