Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20268 (AP)

MRINAL CHOWDHURY v. THE NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY

WP/26507/2001 · 2025-08-06

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010284182001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 26507/2001 Between: 1. MRINAL CHOWDHURY, W/O. O.P.SINGH TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER, NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOL VISAKHAPATNAM. 1. THE NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGING COMMITTEE, COMMODORE, CIRCLES, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOLII, REP. BY ITS COORDINATOR, NAVAL BASE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOLII, REP. BY ITS HEADMISTRESS, SVN COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. Petition under Article 226 circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari (1) call for the records rela impugned order No. 123/3/9/NPS respondent and quash or set aside the same holding it as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India; (2) consequentl direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner forthwith with all consequential benefits that flow from out of such a reinstatement like Pay fixation, arrears of salary and continuity of service etc. and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 26507/2001 MRINAL CHOWDHURY, W/O. O.P.SINGH TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER, NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOL-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, R/O. ...PETITIONER AND THE NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGING COMMITTEE, COMMODORE, K.K.PANDA, INS CIRCLES, VISAKHAPATNAM. THE NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOLII, REP. BY ITS COORDINATOR, NAVAL BASE, VISAKHAPATNAM. THE NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOLII, REP. BY ITS HEADMISTRESS, SVN COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari (1) call for the records relating to and connected with the impugned order No. 123/3/9/NPS-II/Ter., dated 6.12.2001 of the 1st respondent and quash or set aside the same holding it as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India; (2) consequentl direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner forthwith with all consequential benefits that flow from out of such a reinstatement like Pay fixation, arrears of salary and continuity of service etc. and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI MRINAL CHOWDHURY, W/O. O.P.SINGH TRAINED GRADUATE II, VISAKHAPATNAM, R/O. ...PETITIONER THE NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN K.K.PANDA, INS THE NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOLII, REP. BY ITS COORDINATOR, THE NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOLII, REP. BY ITS HEADMISTRESS, SVN ...RESPONDENT(S): of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of ting to and connected with the II/Ter., dated 6.12.2001 of the 1st respondent and quash or set aside the same holding it as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India; (2) consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner forthwith with all consequential benefits that flow from out of such a reinstatement like Pay 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2001(WPMP 33553 OF 2001 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to fill up the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (Hindi) in Naval Public School-II, Visakhapatnam in pursuance of the notification published in Indian Express, Visakhapatnam edition on 20.12.2001 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2001(WPMP 33554 OF 2001 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order No. 122/3/9/NPS-II/Ter., dated 6.12.2001 of the 1st respondent and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Trained Graduate Teacher (Hindi) in Naval Public School-II, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 15338 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expediate the hearing by fixing an early date and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2002(WPMP 15339 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to enteration the petitioner into service pending disposal of the Writ Petition or pass IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 33757 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of termination orders dated 16-12-2001 so as to enable the petitioner to continue as a Trained Graduate Teacher in Naval Public School-II, Visakhapatnam". Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V R CHOUDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Y V ANIL KUMAR (Central Government Counsel) 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of both the parties. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 03.07.2025 and 17.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 07.08.2025 MP 4 202 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:26507 of 2001 Date: 07.08.2025 MP