Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202678 (ALL)

BRIJ KISHOR MAURYA @ CHHOTAKKE @ BRIJ KISHOR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/8921/2025 · 2025-10-28

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8921 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Sri Anuj Kumar Singh, Advocate, has put in appearance for the private opposite party no. 2 and has filed his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s)/petitioner(s) for the following main relief:- "Quash the entire Criminal Proceeding as well as the impugned summoning order dated 27.07.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T.) Act, Lucknow, in Session Case No. 1363/2021, State Versus Brij Kushor Maurya urf Chhotakke, arising out of Case Crime No. 202 / 2021 under sections 294, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act, 1989 at Police Station Malihabad, District-Lucknow Rural, contained in Annexure No. 2 to this petition." Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No. 4 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kunwar Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Brij Kishor Maurya @ Chhotakke @ Brij Kishor .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned Court within four week's from today. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned Court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. October 28, 2025 Vinay/- A482 No. 8921 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench