HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6167 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Kartikey Dubey, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Devendra Mohan Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Bhavesh Chandel, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sachin Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent No.2-Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. 2. By means of this writ petition, prayer has been made for directing respondent No.1 i.e. the State to decide the revision petition said to have been preferred by the petitioner, dated 13.07.2025, expeditiously. 3. Having regard to the innocuous nature of prayer made in this petition, the writ petition is allowed with the consent of parties with direction to respondent No.1 to decide the revision petition preferred by the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties and to make earnest endeavour to decide the same at the earliest. 4. It is also provided that the application dated 13.07.2025 seeking grant of interim relief moved by the petitioner shall also be decided within a period of three weeks from today. October 28, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kartikey Dubey, Ramesh Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sachin Upadhyay (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) M/S Solitaire Infomedia Private Limited Thru.Interim Resolution,Professional Mr.Jalesh Kumar Grover .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Infra. And Indus. Deve. Lko And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench