Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202661 (ALL)

DHARMENDRA KUMAR DWIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/12561/2025 · 2025-10-28

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12561 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Although present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging punishment order dated 06.01.2020, learned counsel for petitioner submits that appeal dated 05.06.2024 filed thereagainst is still pending consideration. At present learned counsel for petitioner restricts prayer for a direction to authority concerned to decide the Appeal preferred by petitioner. 3. Learned State Counsel, however, submits that the documents indicated by petitioner are merely representation and not Appeal. 4. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner is granted liberty to file Appeal against punishment order dated 06.01.2020. In case any such Appeal is preferred before authority concerned, the same may be considered and decided expeditiously within a period of three months from the date of filing Appeal along with a certified copy of this order before the authority concerned. 5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 28, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajeev Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Dharmendra Kumar Dwivedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Rural Development Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench