HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6315 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Deepak Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial) - Ist, Lucknow Division, Lucknow, to decide the interim relief application dated 26.05.2025 in Appeal No. 2304 of 2025 - Santlal Vs. Ram Kumar & Others, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial) - Ist, Lucknow Division, Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid interim relief application 26.05.2025 in Appeal No. 2304 of 2025 - Santlal Vs. Ram Kumar & Others, in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial) - Ist, Lucknow Division, Lucknow, is directed to decide interim relief application 26.05.2025 in Appeal No. 2304 of 2025 - Santlal Vs. Ram Kumar & Others, expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of service report upon the opposite parties therein, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kumar Pandey, Gaurav Singh, Piyush Agnihotri, Shailesh Sachan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Sant Lal Tivari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench