AJAY SINGH BARNALA S/O KALYAN SINGH BARNALA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6937/2025 · 2025-08-04
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20266 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20266 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29685] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6937/2025 Ajay Singh Barnala S/o Kalyan Singh Barnala, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Plot No. 89, Village Umreti, Post Balwaadi, Tehsil Varla, Police Station Varla, District Badwaani, Madhya Pradesh. (At Present Confined At District Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nidhi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 04/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.141/2025 registered at Police Station Jawahar Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence punishable under Sections 305(A) & 331(4) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. She submit that investigation is almost complete and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2025 and there are no criminal antecedents against him. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:29685] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6937/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by magistrate and trial will take time in its conclusion; absence of criminal antecedents as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6.
This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Ajay Singh Barnala S/o Kalyan Singh Barnala shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /c-1