IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 596/2024 Decided on: 07.01.2025 Sudarshan Sharma …Petitioner Versus Kadam Sandeep Secretary & Anr. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that compliance affidavit will be filed during the course of the day. Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a copy of the same for perusal. Alongwith the compliance affidavit, consideration order dated 06.01.2025 has also been appended. The order has been passed pursuant to the decision rendered in Sudarshan Sharma Vs. State of H.P. & Anr.2 2. Taking note of the compliance affidavit and the appended consideration order, present proceedings are closed. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2CWP No.1587/2024 decided on 05.03.2024 Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for redressal of his surviving grievance(s), if any. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 07th January 2025(rohit)