RAM BABU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A482/619/2024 · 2025-10-28
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202658 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202658 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 619 of 2024 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the record.
2. By means of this application preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the applicant has prayed for quashing of the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.2308010 of 2019, Kamlesh Kumar Vs. Ram Babu, under Sections 498A and 323 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Harpalpur, District Hardoi as well as the summoning order dated 16.08.2023 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC, Hardoi.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he would like to file an application for discharge under the provisions of Cr.P.C., to which learned counsel for the State, does not have any objection.
4. Accordingly, the applicant is granted liberty to file an application for discharge in conformity with the provisions of Cr.P.C., within a period of three weeks from today. After the said application is filed, learned trial court is directed to dispose of the same within a period of six weeks thereafter. The applicant is also granted liberty to appear through his counsel. Till expiry of nine weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Babu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
against him.
5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 Rao/- A482 No. 619 of 2024 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench