BED PRAKASH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR, AMETHI AND OTHERS
A227/6345/2025 · 2025-10-28
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202655 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202655 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6345 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for a direction to the State-respondent to decide demarcation case bearing computer no. T202004710204093 (Bed Prakash Vs. Kanhaiya Bux Singh and others)filed U/S 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Sub-Divisional Officer, Mushafirkhana, Amethi is directed to decide demarcation case bearing computer no. T202004710204093 (Bed Prakash Vs. Kanhaiya Bux Singh and others)filed U/S 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Kumar Tiwari, Anoop Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Bed Prakash And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Amethi And Others .....Respondent(s)
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 Ravi/Anurag A227 No. 6345 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench