MOHAMMAD ILIYASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/9797/2025 · 2025-10-28
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202652 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202652 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9797 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1.Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and S.P. Singh learned AGA for all the opposite parties.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned FIR dated 28.09.2025 bearing FIR/Case Crime No.145 of 2025, under Sections 417, 467, 468 & 471 I.P.C. and Section 12 of Passport Act, 1967, Police Station-Rahimabad, District-Lucknow, which is contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case as he has not committed any offence as alleged in the prosecution story so narrated in the impugned F.I.R.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioner may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and direction may be issued to decide the same with expedition.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the aforesaid innocuous request of learned counsel for the petitioner, we hereby dispose of this writ petition at admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law within a period of two weeks from today and if such anticipatory bail application is filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the same may be heard and disposed of on its own merit, strictly in accordance with law, with Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Verma, Chhatrapal Rawat Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohammad Iliyash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
expedition without giving any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties. October28,2025 Suresh/ CRLP No. 9797 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench