MANMEET KUMAR SONKER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/918/2017 · 2025-10-28
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202634 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202634 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 918 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 28, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Onkar Singh Kushwaha, Amrendra Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Moni Yadav, Vidyawasini Kumar, Vikrant Raghuvanshi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Manmeet Kumar Sonker .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench