Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202621 (ALL)

ALOK KUMAR (IN THE IMPUGNED ORDER MENTIONED AS ALOK AGRAHARI) AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/8688/2025 · 2025-10-28

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8688 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed with the following prayer: “For the facts and reasons mentioned in the accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be quash the summoning 17.3.2020 passed by the Additional District Session Judge, Court No. 9, Ayodhya passed in Sessions Trial No. 219 of 2024 (State Versus Alok pleased to order Bikapur, & Agrahari and another) arising from Case Crime No. 271 of 2019 registered at Police Station District Ayodhya where by the learned court below summoned the petitioner No. 1 under Sections 394, 506, 411, 307 of I.P.C. and the petitioner No. 2 under Sections 394, 354-A, 506, 411, 307 of I.P.C. as well as charge sheet dated 29.06.2019 submitted in Case Crime No. 271 of 2019 registered at Police Station Bikapur, District Ayodhya, in the interest of justice. The Hon'ble Court may also be pleased to stay the entire proceeding relating to the Session Trial No. 219 of 2024 (State Versus Alok Agrahari and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 219 of 2019 registered at Police Station Bikapur, District Ayodhya, in the interest of justice. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saurabh Kumar, Sunil Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Alok Kumar (In The Impugned Order Mentioned As Alok Agrahari) And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Hon'ble Court may also be pleased to pass any other order or direction which is deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press this application, and prays to withdraw it, with liberty to pursue the discharge application which is pending before the competent court. 3. The learned Addl. Government Advocate has no objection to the prayer made. 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. October 28, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 8688 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench