ARMAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.URBAN DEVELOPMENT CIVIL SECTT.and ORS.
WRIA/2798/2017 · 2025-10-28
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202613 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202613 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 2798 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 28, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Srivastava, R.N. Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ram Kumar Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Arman .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Urban Development Civil Sectt.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench