MANOHAR VALMIK PATIL v. PRIYANKA MANOHAR PATIL AND ANOTHER
WP/936/2022 · 2025-09-22
Shri Sushil M Ghodeswar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20261 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20261 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 of 1 27-WP.936.2022.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 27 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 936 OF 2022 MANOHAR VALMIK PATIL VERSUS PRIYANKA MANOHAR PATIL AND ANOTHER ... Mr. Dipesh D. Pande, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Rahil Riyazoddin Kazi, Advocate for Respondent No.1. ...
CORAM :
SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE :
22nd SEPTEMBER, 2025 P.C.:-
1. At the outset, learned Advocates for respective parties submits that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, they are seeking for disposal of the petition.
2. Hence, petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) Tauseef 2025:BHC-AUG:25914