Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202607 (MAD)

Savithiri @ Savithri v. State rep.by, The Sub-Inspector of Police

CRL OP/34185/2025 · 2025-12-15

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 34185 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 34185 of 2025 1. Savithiri @ Savithri No.88, Mariyamman kovil street, Kanniyankuppam, Puliyur, Vriddhachalam taluk, Cuddalore-606 104. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State rep.by, The Sub-Inspector of Police Mangalampet police station, Cuddalore District. Cr.No.168/2025. Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in connection with the Cr.No.168 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.K.Muruganandham For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(A) & 4(1)(C) of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 34185 of 2025 Tamil Nadu Prohibition (amendment) Act 2024 in Crime No.168 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 40 liquor bottles, each containing 180 ml, for the purpose of selling the same as retail. Hence the compliant. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 40 liquor bottles without any proper license. She would also submit that there are 3 previous cases of similar nature pending against the petitioner. Hence, she vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the nature of offence committed by the petitioner, and taking note of the fact that there are 3 previous cases of similar nature pending against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 34185 of 2025 petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 15-12-2025 Gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.State rep.by, The Sub-Inspector of Police Mangalampet police station, Cuddalore District. Cr.No.168/2025. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 34185 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 34185 of 2025 15-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis