NEELAM TOMAR AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME AFFAIRS LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/12579/2025 · 2025-10-28
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12579 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- (i) issue, a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities, to consider the Out-of-Turn promotion on the basis of Sports Performance, of the petitioners from the post of Constable/Constable Driver to Head Constable /Head Constable (Motor Transport)./ Head Constable to sub- Inspector in accordance with the Rule 16 & 18 (1), of Uttar Pradesh Police (Skilled Players) Recruitment and Promotion Without Innings Rules-2021.
(ii) issue, a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities, to grant Out-of-Turn promotion to the petitioners, from post of Constable / Constable Driver to Head Constable Head Constable (Motor Transport)/Head Constable to sub Inspector, on the basis of Sports Performance, in accordance with the Rule 16 & 18 (1), of Uttar Pradesh Police (Skilled Players) Recruitment and Promotion Without Innings Rules-2021."
3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before opposite party no.5 i.e. Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Police Sports Control Board & Inspector General of Police, P.A.C., Central Zone, Mahanagar, Lucknow. In case such representations are filed, the same are required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation(s) of petitioners along with a certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suyash Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Neelam Tomar And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Affairs Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 28, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 12579 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench