Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202599 (ALL)

SMT. SUMAN v. TAHSILDAR, TAHSIL LALGANJ, PRATAPGARH AND ANOTHER

A227/6316/2025 · 2025-10-28

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6316 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajnish Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Lalganj, District - Pratapgarh, to decide Case No. 3386 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202402570203386) - Smt. Suman Vs. Shushila Devi, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Lalganj, District - Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Lalganj, District - Pratapgarh, is directed to decide Case No. 3386 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202402570203386) - Smt. Suman Vs. Shushila Devi, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajnish Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt. Suman .....Petitioner(s) Tahsildar, Tahsil Lalganj, Pratapgarh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench