HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6329 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to the respondent No. 1- Apar Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda to consider and decide the stay application filed along with revision No. C202508000001633 (Mu. Ashiya Begum Vs. Shiv Sagar and others), U/S 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the grievance of the petioenr shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 1 is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid stay application in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1- Apar Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda to consider and decide stay application aVersus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mu. Ashiya Begum .....Petitioner(s) Apar Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda And Others .....Respondent(s) filed along with revision No. C202508000001633 (Mu. Ashiya Begum Vs. Shiv Sagar and others), U/S 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code within a period of six weeks from the date sufficiency of service is received with regard to the respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. October 28, 2025 Ravi/Anurag A227 No. 6329 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench