KUMKUM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
BAIL/9062/2025 · 2025-10-28
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202574 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202574 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9062 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 118 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 238 BNS, P.S. Sangrampur, District Amethi.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR which was lodged against unknown persons it was alleged that nephew of informant aged about 22 years was missing and subsequently he was found dead. It was stated that some unknown persons had committed the offence. Subsequently based upon recovery of video in which the applicant was shown in compromising position and apprehension was expressed that the applicant alongwith co accused had committed the offence in question. The applicant was implicated on the basis of confessional statement. No recovery of weapon was done.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and weak piece of evidence, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 5.6.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Aklavya, Anjali Kumari, Karunesh Satyam, Mamta Rawat, Shreyansh Chandra Kumkum .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Kumkum be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 28, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9062 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench