Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202570 (ALL)

ABDUL JABBAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ZILADHIKARI, AMETHI AND OTHERS

A227/6233/2025 · 2025-10-28

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6233 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.20 - Gaon Sabha has been accepted by Sri Mohan Singh. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to opposite party No.2 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide Revision No.01132/2020, Abdul Jabbar Vs. Babadeen and others, under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing counsel has no objection, if direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the revision. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide Revision No.01132/2020, Abdul Jabbar Vs. Babadeen and others, under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Abdul Jabbar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Ziladhikari, Amethi And Others .....Respondent(s) shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6233 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench