Narasapuram Ussainamma v. The Station House Officer
WP/18724/2020 · 2025-08-17
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20257 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20257 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010283692020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18724/2020 Between:
1. NARASAPURAM USSAINAMMA, S/O. LATE PAKKIRA AGE. 65 YEARS R/O. GUNTAPALEM STREET, MUTHYALAPADU VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHAGALAMARRI POLICE STATION, CHAGALAMARRI, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
4. KADARAGALLA KHADAR VALI, S/O. GURRAPPA, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. GUNTAPALEM STREET, MUTHYALAPADU VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent in interfering in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the respondent No.4 in respect of the land extent Ac.4.87 cents situated in Sy.No.1505 of
Muthyalapadu Village, Chagalamarri Mandal, Kurnool District which is the suit schedule property in O.S.No. 276/2015 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the civil dispute in respect suit schedule property in O.S.No. 276/2015 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the civil dispute in respect of the land extent Ac.4.87 cents situated in Sy.No.1505 of Muthyalapadu Village, Chagalamarri Mandal, Kurnool District i.e. suit schedule property in O.S.No. 276/2015 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District without following due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:18724 of 2020
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent in interfering in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the respondent No.4 in respect of the land extent Ac.4.87 cents situated in Sy.No.1505 of Muthyalapadu Village, Chagalamarri Mandal, Kurnool District which is the suit schedule property in O.S.No.276/2015 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the civil dispute in respect suit schedule property in O.S.No.276/2015 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District and pass…”
2. Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, would submit that the matter in the present petition is purely civil in nature and the respondent-Police are not interfering into the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court to dispose of the writ petition, by recording the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
5. By recording the same, the Writ petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed not to interfere into the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents herein, without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.08.2025. SRT
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.18724 of 2020
Dated.18.08.2025
SRT
180