Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202568 (ALL)

SANJAY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/8695/2025 · 2025-10-28

Rajeev Singh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8695 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application is filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Session Trial No.1052 of 2025 in Case Crime No.181/2020 under Section 306 I.P.C., Police Station Jagatpur, District - Raebareli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case and charge sheet was submitted by the Investigating Officer under Section 306 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C. He also submits that discharge application was filed but same was rejected by the learned court below in the most mechanical manner, therefore, indulgence of this Court is necessary. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer of the applicant and submits that during the course of investigation, suicide note was found, which reveals that on the behest of the applicant and other accused persons, deceased was implicated in a case of sexual assault by one Suneeta, as a result, he committed suicide. He further submits that there is no illegality in the order passed by the court below, therefore, present application is liable to be dismissed. 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ganga Singh, Anil Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanjay Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) going through the contents of the application as well as other relevant documents, it is evident that after collecting the evidences against the applicant, charge sheet was submitted by the Investigating Officer and learned court below has rightly considered the contents of the evidences collected by the Investigating Officer, therefore, this Court is of the view that there is no illegality in the order passed by the court below. 6. In view of the above discussion, present application is dismissed. October 28, 2025 GauraV/- A482 No. 8695 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench