HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9997 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Umesh Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rahul Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. and Shri Anagh Misra, the learned counsel for the respondent No.4- National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent No.4 has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has got a statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 18 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act 1993 available and, therefore, this writ petition should not be entertained. 3. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. October 28, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anagh Misra (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Jagwant Singh Bhadauria Public School Thru. Authorized Signatory Brajesh Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Education, Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench