Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202561 (ALL)

IMRAN GAJI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9851/2025 · 2025-10-28

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9851 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and perused the record. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 02.06.2025 bearing FIR/Case Crime No.87 of 2025 for the offence under Section 66-D of I.T. Act & Sections 319(2) and 318(4) of B.N.S., Police Station- Cyber Crime, District- Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in the FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas the police is trying to arrest the petitioner, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. 5. Learned A.G.A. appearing for respondent-State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in re; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273, and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, Special Leave to Appeal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Saem Shiraz Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Imran Gaji .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. 6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Apex Court in re; Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 8. However, it is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 4.11.2025 at 11:00 AM sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, he will continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. October 28, 2025 Praveen/Anuj CRLP No. 9851 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench